Device Size Comparison
Weight
The Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is 562g heavier than the iPhone 16 (330.6%).
Height
The Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is 178.8mm taller than the iPhone 16.
Width
The Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is 137mm wider than the iPhone 16.
Thickness
The iPhone 16 is 2.3mm thicker than the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra.
Smaller body
iPhone 16
iPhone 16 (71.6 × 147.6 mm) vs Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (208.6 × 326.4 mm).
Lighter weight
iPhone 16
iPhone 16 (170 g) vs Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (732 g), 562 g lighter.
Thinner design
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (5.5 mm) vs iPhone 16 (7.8 mm).
Pocketability
iPhone 16
iPhone 16 has a smaller overall body size for pocket carry (71.6 × 147.6 × 7.8 mm).
Larger overall size
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is 137 mm wider and 178.8 mm taller than iPhone 16 (208.6 × 326.4 mm vs 71.6 × 147.6 mm).
| Dimension | Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | iPhone 16 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 208.6 mm | 71.6 mm | -137 mm |
| Height | 326.4 mm | 147.6 mm | -178.8 mm |
| Thickness | 5.5 mm | 7.8 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 732 g | 170 g | -562 g |
Pocket Carry
The iPhone 16 is the better pocket fit on paper; the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra may feel tighter when stored vertically in shallow pockets.
One-Hand Use
The iPhone 16's shorter body may reduce vertical thumb travel; the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra covers more height when reaching the top of the screen.
Daily Comfort
Listed weight and bulk move together here: the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is both heavier and larger, which can feel more substantial during routine handheld use.
Travel & Bag Carry
The Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra uses more organizer space in a bag or backpack; the iPhone 16 leaves more room beside cases and chargers, and the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra adds more listed mass to a packed carry.
Who should choose the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra?
Choose the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra if thinner 5.5 mm profile (vs 7.8 mm) matter most to you, even though it also has higher listed weight (732g vs 170g), wider 208.6 mm body (vs 71.6 mm), taller 326.4 mm frame (vs 147.6 mm), and larger overall footprint (208.6 × 326.4 mm vs 71.6 × 147.6 mm) compared with the iPhone 16.
Who should choose the iPhone 16?
Choose the iPhone 16 if lighter listed weight (170g vs 732g), narrower 71.6 mm width (vs 208.6 mm), shorter 147.6 mm height (vs 326.4 mm), and smaller width × height footprint (71.6 × 147.6 mm vs 208.6 × 326.4 mm) matter most to you, even though it also has thicker 7.8 mm edge (vs 5.5 mm) compared with the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra.
Overall recommendation
Overall, the iPhone 16 is the more compact pick on listed size, and the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is the larger option for buyers who want more physical presence from the official dimensions alone.
More size comparisons from the same device families, brands, and recent flagship models.
Open Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra and iPhone 16 in the comparison tool